Epidemic Investigation
For the competency on epidemic investigation, the students are expected to describe how exactly they would carry out the epidemic investigation. They maybe asked to describe the steps of epidemic investigation. Or they maybe asked about one of the steps of epidemic investigation. Example - Construct a case definition; identify the type of epidemic; draw a spot map; make a linelist; calculate attack rates.
Steps of Epidemic Investigation
What is an outbreak /epidemic?
An outbreak or an epidemic is the occurrence of more cases of disease than expected in a given area or among a specific group of people over a particular period of time.
In an epidemic or outbreak, it is usually presumed that the cases are related to one another or that they have a common cause.
Differentiate between outbreak, epidemic and cluster.
Outbreak - Increase in cases is more of a localised situation e.g. village, institution, housing society etc.
Epidemic - involves large numbers of people over a wide geographic area. Epidemic implies a crisis situation.
Cluster - aggregation of cases in a given area over a particular period without regard to whether the number of cases is more than expected.
How is an epidemic uncovered?
Health dept alerted by a Clinician (most common way) who finds an increased number of cases or unusual clinical presentation.
Analysis of surveillance data reveals increased number of cases or unusual clustering of cases.
Members of affected community report to the health dept when they observe several similar cases in their community.
Why should an epidemic be investigated?
Investigation helps to
define the magnitude of the epidemic.
determine the conditions and factors that led to the occurrence of the epidemic.
institute prevention and control measures.
recommend measures for preventing future epidemics of same or similar nature.
identify the causative agent, sources of infection, and modes of transmission.
understand natural history of disease, risk factors and population at risk.
assess the effectiveness of programme strategies that are already in place. e.g. measles outbreak in a country where measles vaccination is an ongoing activity.
demonstrate that the government cares for the health of its citizens and thereby maintain good public relations.
rule out any biological warfare for addressing political concerns.
Enumerate the 10 steps of epidemic investigation.
Establish the existence of an epidemic
Verify the diagnosis
Construct a working case definition
Search for cases systematically and record information
Perform descriptive epidemiology
Develop hypotheses
Evaluate hypotheses epidemiologically
If needed, reconsider, refine and re-evaluate hypotheses
Implement control and prevention measures
Communicate findings
Step 1: establish existence of an epidemic
Step 1: Establish the existence of an epidemic
To confirm existence of an epidemic compare observed figures with expected figures.
Observed figures should be more than expected.
In some cases, comparison not required (e.g. common source epidemics like cholera, food poisoning).
A single case of a disease that is not known to exist in country is also considered as epidemic (e.g. polio in a country that has eliminated polio from last 10 years).
Expected number is the number that you would normally expect to see (can compare from the previous few weeks or months, or from a comparable period during the previous few years).
Expected number could be
1. Obtained from health department surveillance records.
2. Retrieved from existing local data (hospital discharge records, mortality statistics, cancer or birth defect registries).
3. Calculated by applying disease rates from neighbouring states or national data if local data is not available.
4. Obtained by conducting a telephone survey of physicians to determine whether they have seen more cases of the disease than usual.
5. Obtained by conducting survey of the community to establish the background or historical level of disease.
Do increased cases really mean outbreak?
Mostly yes. But, Not every time the increased numbers are due to outbreak. It could be due to
1. changes in local reporting procedures.
2. changes in the case definition.
3. increased interest because of local or national awareness.
4. improvements in diagnostic procedures.
5. consistent reporting by health care facility.
6. changes in size of population.
Step 2: verifying diagnosis
Why should one verify the diagnosis?
1. To ensure disease has been accurately diagnosed.
2. To rule out laboratory error.
How is diagnosis verified?
By reviewing clinical findings and laboratory findings
Correlate clinical and laboratory findings. If laboratory findings are inconsistent with clinical and epidemiological findings, ask an expert to review technique or send to reference lab for confirmation
By talking to patients
Talking to patients - Helps in better understanding of disease. Conversation with the patients will help in
a. Forming a visual image of patient affected by disease.
b. Identification of the exposures before the person became ill.
c. Finding out if the case patients know anyone with similar illness or they have anything in common with those who have the disease.
d. Generating hypothesis about disease aetiology and spread.
By summarising the clinical finding with frequency distribution, the epidemiologist can
a. Assess if clinical findings are consistent with the diagnosis.
b. Characterise the spectrum of illness.
c. Frame case definitions.
STEP 3: Construct a case definition
What does the term case definition mean?
A case definition is a standard set of criteria for deciding whether an individual should be classified as having the health condition of interest.
Case definition should be able to detect most of the cases and should have very few false positive cases.
Initial case definition can be broad, subsequent ones more specific.
If uncertainty formulate 3 definitions - possible/suspect, probable and confirmed cases.
Once decided, apply consistently to all persons being investigated.
Criteria for framing a case definition
A case definition should include
Clinical criteria –simple and objective (e.g. Fever 38 deg C)
Restricted by time (e.g. onset of symptoms in past 14 days)
Restricted by place (e.g. residents of village X)
Restricted by person (e.g. persons aged below 5 years))
Case definition should not include exposure or risk factor that you want to test (e.g. if your hypothesis is that curry A is associated with food poisoning, do not mention that in case definition).
Example of possible, probable and confirmed case definition.
Possible case – has few of typical clinical features
Example: A child aged 5-10 years (person characteristic) studying in 'PVD' school (Place restriction) with symptoms of abdominal pain and diarrhoea (clinical criteria) with onset of symptoms between 11-16th Jul (time restriction).
Probable case – has typical clinical features without laboratory confirmation
Example: A child aged 5-10 years (person characteristic) studying in 'PVD' school who had attended school picnic (Place restriction) and presenting with symptoms of abdominal pain, diarrhoea and blood in stools (clinical criteria) with onset of symptoms between 11-16th Jul (time restriction).
Confirmed / Definite case – clinical features and lab confirmation
A child aged 5-10 years (person characteristic) studying in 'PVD' school who had attended school picnic (Place restriction) and presenting with symptoms of abdominal pain, diarrhoea and blood in stools (clinical criteria) with onset of symptoms between 11-16th Jul (time restriction) and a positive stool culture report for E.coli (laboratory confirmaiton).
Why have so many case definitions?
Having Possible, Probable & Confirmed Case Definitions can be useful
In keeping a track of cases even when diagnosis is not established.
When lab results are awaited.
When test is costly and difficult to obtain (you may choose to rely on clinical features).
When an outbreak occurs in confined settings like ship, hostel etc, diagnosis is confirmed from a few affected persons and then all others having similar illness are identified as probable case.
STEP 4: Search for cases
Why search for cases?
Only few cases get reported, so you have to search for more cases.
To determine geographical extent of problem & population affected.
How do you search for cases?
Direct case finding at facilities where diagnosis is likely to happen – hospitals, clinics, nursing home.
Alert the public through media - e.g outbreaks due to food product.
Survey the entire population if an outbreak occurs in a restricted population. e.g. school, ship, workplace.
Ask case patients if they know someone with similar illness.
How long should you search for cases?
Search for a period equal to two incubation period, since the occurrence of the last case.
List the information you would collect from cases.
Identifying information
Name for checking duplicate records.
Address for the purpose of mapping.
Address and Phone number to contact them for further questions or notifying them results and outcome of investigations.
Demographic information
Record age, sex, race, occupation etc. for characterising population at risk (person characteristics of descriptive epidemiology).
Clinical information
Record symptoms / signs, Date of onset, Other clinical information, duration of illness,hospitalisation,death etc. to verify if case definition is met. Date of onset will help you to chart epidemic curve. Spectrum of illness can be described based on this information.
Risk Factor information
Tells you about the incriminating factors. E.g. in case of diarrhoeal disease outbreak, enquire about exposure to food and water sources.
Reporter information
Record name, address, phone number of the physician,clinic, hospital, lab etc. from where report is obtained. This information can be useful at later stages if you need to seek additional clinical information or to report on the results of your investigations.
Where is the information from cases recorded?
Collect the data in a
Standard case report format or
Epidemiological case sheet
What is a Line List?
When data collected in epidemiological sheet is abstracted with selected critical items into a tabular form, it is called as a line list.
step 5: descriptive epidemiology
Descriptive epidemiology means describe the outbreak in terms of Time, Place and Person. It is a very critical step, done several times during the course of the investigation of the epidemic
Descriptive epidemiology is useful in many ways:
A comprehensive description of the outbreak is possible.
Time trend, geographical extent, population affected
Identifies the population at risk of disease.
Provides clues about aetiology, source of infection, modes of spread.
Strategies and Interventions can be planned on the basis of data.
Time distribution of data - Epidemic curve
Place distribution of data - Spot and Area maps
Person distribution of data
Person characteristic to analyse will depend on the disease that is being investigated.
Example of Host characteristics that need to be described
Age
Sex
Race
Marital status
Medical status
Example of Exposure factors that need to be described
Occupation
Leisure activities
Use of medications
Use of tobacco / drugs / alcohol
step 6: develop hypothesis
What is hypothesis?
A hypothesis is a statement based on the data collected, as to what is the likely source of infection, the causative agent, the mode of spread of diseases and the exposure or environmental factors that led to the occurrence of the disease.
To formulate an hypothesis, refer to the following information that you have gathered already.
Information about the disease - Reservoir of infection, routes of transmission, vehicles commonly implicated, known risk factors.
Epidemiological data of cases (Time, place and person distribution) - Is the epidemic curve showing narrow period of exposure, why only people in a particular area affected, why only some groups of people are affected etc. Are there any outliers in the data.
Information gathered through talks with patients (reveals about risk factors) and local authorities (reveals local practices).
Information obtained through observations in field.
step 7: testing of hypothesis
How is the hypothesis evaluated ?
There are two ways of testing / evaluating hypothesis i.e.
1. Compare with established facts
When clinical, laboratory, environmental or epidemiological evidence very obviously supports the evidence
e.g. Hypervitaminosis D outbreak in Massachusetts 1991
2. Undertake analytical epidemiological studies
Cohort study – e.g. outbreak of gastro-enteritis in New York 1940
Case control study –e.g. Legionnaires disease, in Louisiana
Step 8: Refine hypothesis
When do you need to refine your hypothesis?
Hypothesis may need to be reconsidered, refined or re-evaluated if
Analytical studies do not reveal anything.
Example an outbreak of food poisoning where a food curry was postulated to be the reason for the outbreak. However the laboratory testing of the food samples do not reveal the causative micro-organism. Further studies will need to be undertaken to find out the source of exposure.
2 An association is proved, and you want to further narrow down an identify the responsible source.
Example an outbreak investigation identifies a source of exposure say a restaurant X. further studies can identify which food item was responsible.
step 9: implement prevention and control measures
Which prevention and control measures should be implemented?
Depending on the disease, the prevention and control measures will vary. Broady these measures can be classifed as measures against
source of infection
interrupt transmission
protect susceptible host
Examples of prevention and control measures
Eliminate source of Infection or reservoir of infection
Destroy mosquito breeding sites
Stop the infectious food handler from working in the kitchen
Sterilise contaminated water
Treat the individual and render the person non-infectious
Interrupt transmission
Use personal protective equipment like N-95 mask
Isolate the infectious case
Quarantine the healthy contact of an infectious case
Use insecticide to kill vectors spreading diseases like malaria, dengue
Protect susceptible host
Vaccinate with COVID-!9 vaccine
Chemoprophylaxis against Malaria
step 10: Communicate findings
The findings of the investigations need to be conveyed verbally and in writing. Verbal briefing is essential from time to time or on a daily basis to the local health authorities and administrative authorities.
A written detailed report serves as a blue print for action. The report contains details of how the investigation was carried out and serves as a document for potential legal issues. It serves as a reference for similar outbreak management in future and adds to the knowledge base of epidemiology and public health.
Reference
Text book of Park, 26th Edition
Principles of EPIDEMIOLOGY in Public Health Practice Third Edition An Introduction to Applied Epidemiology and Biostatistics - Self Studycourse SS-1978. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Office of Workforce and Career Development Atlanta, GA 30333
https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dsepd/ss1978/index.html
Principles of EPIDEMIOLOGY, An Introduction to Applied Epidemiology and Biostatistics. Second Edition. SELF-STUDY Course 3030-G. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Epidemiology Program Office, Public Health Practice Program Office, Atlanta, Georgia 30333
Epidemic curve
https://www.cdc.gov/training/quicklearns/createepi/
Focus Epidemiology
https://sph.unc.edu/epid/focus/
Outbreak Investigation | National Health Portal Of India (nhp.gov.in)